The Commonwealth Fund contracted with the Rand Corporation to analyze the Clinton and Trump proposed health reforms. They recently analyzed four main proposals by Secretary Clinton to improve the functioning of the Affordable Care Act (ACA): 1) tax credits for individuals whose out of pocket spending exceeds 5% of income, 2) reductions in the maximum premium contribution from 9.66% to 8.5%, 3) capping families premium contributions at 8.5%, and 4) the public option for individuals in the Exchanges. This requires an understanding of how the Affordable Care Act works so each needs a little more explanation.

§1332 waivers allow states to waive specified provisions of the Affordable Care Act as long as they are cost neutral to the federal government, cover at least as many people as are already eligible, cover at least as many services as are already covered and are at least as affordable as the ACA. California’s waiver would seek federal approval so that the state Exchange (Covered California) can offer mirror coverage opportunities for the undocumented, but without any federal or state premium assistance or out pocket assistance.

§1332 waivers allow each state to tailor the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to its own local conditions. Hawaii was the first state to propose a §1332 waiver, and it is a very interesting one because Hawaii already has achieved one of the lowest uninsured rates and some of the lowest premiums in the country. Hawaii seeks to waive the requirement to establish a SHOP purchasing pool for small employers. The state’s rationale was that it’s expensive to establish and very few small employers participated.

One of the best questions at last year’s ITUP conference involved the differences and overlap between Section 2703 Health Homes and the new Section 1115 waiver for whole person care pilots. Both address the same fundamental challenge in the American health system – the lack of important connectivity among its excellent but disparate parts. This is particularly problematic in Medi-Cal due to the behavioral health/physical health divide. Both initiatives address the same populations of severely ill patients who are high users of emergency rooms, many of whom have severe co-occurring physical and behavioral health conditions, and a significant number are homeless individuals.

I’ve had an utterly lovely six months off since leaving ITUP. It’s now time for me to get back to work. The Office of Lucien Wulsin is now open for business. I’ll be affiliating with organizations where our interests and skills align, and you’ll be hearing more about this soon I hope.

Real household income went up by 5.2% -- the fastest growth on record – from 2014 to 2015. Poverty fell by 3.5 million – the largest one year drop since 1968. The uninsured rate fell to 9.1% -- its lowest rate ever. http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.pdf and https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/09/13/income-poverty-and-health-insurance-united-states-2015

The Kaiser Family Foundation has followed the impacts of the Affordable Care Act on uninsured Californians over four reporting periods. They followed a group of over 2000 uninsured from 2013 to 2016. Nearly three fourths gained coverage; primarily through Medicaid (1/3rd), then employment-based coverage (1/5th) and Covered California (1/10th). They were far more likely to report their health needs are being met, their financial worries lessened. Eighty percent said their experiences were positive; they are satisfied with their choice of hospitals and primary care doctors and over 2/3rds are pleased with their choice of specialists.

Joseph Stiglitz describes the changes in the rules undergirding the American economy over the past 40 years that have promoted short-term profit taking as opposed to long-term investments and their impacts in slowing the growth of the American economy.  http://rooseveltinstitute.org/rewriting-rules-report.

The average stock was held for seven years in 1940, for two years in 1987 and for seven months by 2007. Corporate CEO pay as compared to the average worker’s salary has grown from 20/1 in 1965 to 295/1 in 2013. Firms are not investing their capital in equipment needed and designed to increase worker productivity, but rather in stock buy-backs and shareholder dividends.